FOR PHYSICIANS AND HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONALS
A clearer longitudinal view of the patient.
MEDRELEX is exploring how relevant health information across time and sources could be presented in a more useful context for patients and their authorized healthcare professionals. We are seeking clinician input to understand where current workflows fall short and what would genuinely help in practice.
Questions we want to understand
We are speaking with practicing clinicians across primary care and specialties to ground our development in clinical reality.
Which parts of a patient’s history are hardest to reconstruct before or during a consultation?
How do you distinguish source-recorded information, patient-reported information, and information that has been clinically reviewed?
When a measurement changes, what surrounding context is useful—and what risks making a display misleading?
What would make a pre-visit summary useful, safe, and easy to review without adding workflow burden?
Potential workflow concepts
Exploratory concepts designed to inform patient preparation and consultation clarity.
Pre-consultation summary
A concise, time-ordered view of selected history and questions could help structure a discussion.
Changes over time
A timeline could show measurements, medication events, symptoms reported by the person, and relevant dates together.
Source clarity
The interface should make the origin and status of information visible, rather than treating all entries as equally verified.
Conversation support
A summary could help the patient and clinician identify questions or gaps for review.
Support for clinical judgment—not a replacement.
Any future MEDRELEX workflow must preserve clinician judgment, communicate uncertainty, and avoid presenting an automated interpretation as a definitive medical conclusion. The concepts shown here are illustrative and have not been presented as clinically validated.
Ways to contribute
Help us validate whether longitudinal context can reduce documentation fatigue and improve consultation alignment.
Share clinical workflow feedback
A short discussion about current processes, electronic health record pain points, and unmet needs.
Discuss an advisory or research conversation
Explore whether structured input could help shape the clinical validity and safety thesis.
Explore a future pilot
Register institutional interest only; no clinical pilot or validation trial is promised or currently active.